On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 2:27:53 AM CET Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 13-03-18, 11:35, Claudio Scordino wrote: > >> When the SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class increases the CPU utilization, > >> we should not wait for the rate limit, otherwise we may miss some > >> deadline. > >> > >> Tests using rt-app on Exynos5422 with up to 10 SCHED_DEADLINE tasks have > >> shown reductions of even 10% of deadline misses with a negligible > >> increase of energy consumption (measured through Baylibre Cape). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <[email protected]> > >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > >> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > >> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > >> CC: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> > >> CC: Patrick Bellasi <[email protected]> > >> CC: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]> > >> CC: Morten Rasmussen <[email protected]> > >> CC: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> > >> CC: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]> > >> CC: Todd Kjos <[email protected]> > >> CC: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> > >> CC: [email protected] > >> CC: [email protected] > >> --- > >> Changes from v3: > >> - Specific routine renamed as ignore_dl_rate_limit() > > > > LGTM. Thanks. > > Nice! Thanks.
OK, the patch doesn't seem to depend on anything in -tip, so I'm going to apply it. Thanks!
