On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 14:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 05:52:24PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Hi Jarrko,
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 18:56 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > In order to make struct tpm_buf the first class object for constructing
> > > TPM
> > > commands, migrate tpm2_probe() to use it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
> >
> > With this patch, the Pi doesn't find the TPM. I'm seeing the
> > following line in dmesg.
> >
> > [ 1.087414] tpm_tis_spi: probe of spi0.0 failed with error 256
>
> Thank you for reporting this Mimi. Does it have TPM1/TPM2?
The pi has a TPM 2.0 attached to the GPIO. James pointed out the
change in return codes.
+ if (be16_to_cpu(out->tag) == TPM2_ST_NO_SESSIONS)
chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
-
- return 0;
+out:
+ tpm_buf_destroy(&buf);
+ return rc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm2_probe);
Mimi
