On 06/03/2018 22:03, Radim Krcmar wrote:
>>  /* Fam 15h MSRs */
>>  #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL           0xc0010200
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0          MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL1          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 2)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL2          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 4)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL3          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 6)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL4          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 8)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL5          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL + 10)
>> +
>>  #define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR           0xc0010201
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR0          MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR1          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 2)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR2          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 4)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR3          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 6)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR4          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 8)
>> +#define MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5          (MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR + 10)
>> +
> x86 maintainers,
> 
> are you ok with this going through the kvm tree?

Boris, can you ack these new MSRs?

Thanks,

Paolo

Reply via email to