David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:14:10 +0200
>
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> From: Esben Haabendal <e...@deif.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <e...@deif.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
>>> index 654f42d00092..48403170096a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
>>> @@ -1207,6 +1207,22 @@ static void dp83640_remove(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>> kfree(dp83640);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int dp83640_soft_reset(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = genphy_soft_reset(phydev);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + /* From DP83640 datasheet: "Software driver code must wait 3 us
>>> + * following a software reset before allowing further serial MII
>>> + * operations with the DP83640." */
>>> + udelay(3);
>>
>> Hi Esben
>>
>> The accuracy of udelay() is not guaranteed. So you probably want to be
>> a bit pessimistic, and use 10.
Ok, will do.
/Esben
