On 2018-04-13 16:47, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 04/12/2018 05:31 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> On 2018-04-12 17:35, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>>> True, how about "current-sense-from-voltage" ?
>> Doesn't cover "voltage-divider" (and we don't need separate drivers
>> doing the exact same calculations, that's a maintenance nightmare).
> The driver name doesn't have to cover every use, just more than the
> other name.

I also find current-sense-from-voltage unwieldy. It's simply too long.


Reply via email to