On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:19:26PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > @@ -1000,6 +1000,15 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r,
> > bool raz)
> > task_pid_nr(current));
> >
> > val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
> > + } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1) {
> > + const u64 ptrauth_mask = (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT) |
> > + (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT) |
> > + (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPA_SHIFT) |
> > + (0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_SHIFT);
> > + if (val & ptrauth_mask)
> > + pr_err_once("kvm [%i]: ptrauth unsupported for guests,
> > suppressing\n",
> > + task_pid_nr(current));
>
> Marc just changed the equivalent SVE pr_err_once() to kvm_debug().
> So we probably want to do the same here.
Good point. Done.
> > + val &= ~ptrauth_mask;
> > } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1) {
> > if (val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64MMFR1_LOR_SHIFT))
> > pr_err_once("kvm [%i]: LORegions unsupported for
> > guests, suppressing\n",
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
> Otherwise
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
Cheers!
Mark.
