Ingo suggested to display elapsed time for multirun
workload (perf stat -e) with precision based on the
precision of the standard deviation.

In his own words:

  > It would be better if perf stat would display elapsed time with a precision
  > adjusted to stddev, it should display at most 2 more significant digits than
  > the stddev inaccuracy.
  >
  > I.e. in the above case 0.39% is 0.109, so we only have accuracy for 1 
digit, and
  > so we should only display 3:
  >
  >        27.988 seconds time elapsed                                ( +-  
0.39% )

Plus suggestion about the output, which is small enough and
connected with above change that I merged both changes together.

  > Small output style nit - I think it would be nice if with --repeat the 
stddev was
  > also displayed in absolute values, besides percentage:
  >
  >       27.988 +- 0.109 seconds time elapsed   ( +- 0.39% )

The output is now:

   Performance counter stats for './perf bench sched pipe' (5 runs):
   SNIP
           13.3667 +- 0.0256 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.19% )

Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
index 147a27e8c937..6b4f3d359cb3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
@@ -1733,19 +1733,37 @@ static void print_header(int argc, const char **argv)
        }
 }
 
+static int get_precision(double num)
+{
+       if (num > 1)
+               return 0;
+
+       return lround(ceil(-log10(num)));
+}
+
 static void print_footer(void)
 {
+       double avg = avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
        FILE *output = stat_config.output;
        int n;
 
        if (!null_run)
                fprintf(output, "\n");
-       fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed",
-                       avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC);
-       if (run_count > 1) {
-               fprintf(output, "                                        ");
-               print_noise_pct(stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats),
-                               avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats));
+
+       if (run_count == 1) {
+               fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed", avg);
+       } else {
+               double sd = stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
+               /*
+                * Display at most 2 more significant
+                * digits than the stddev inaccuracy.
+                */
+               int precision = get_precision(sd) + 2;
+
+               fprintf(output, " %17.*f +- %.*f seconds time elapsed",
+                       precision, avg, precision, sd);
+
+               print_noise_pct(sd, avg);
        }
        fprintf(output, "\n\n");
 
-- 
2.13.6

Reply via email to