On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 2:33 AM, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 07:03:44PM -0600, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Fri 20-04-18 15:14:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > These fix a number of perf, x86 and sched cases where we have user >> > controlled >> > array dereferences. All were found by Dan's recent Smatch update. >> >> Do we want to mark all of these for stable? > > If we all agree that any (speculative) user-controlled array index -- > irrespective of the existence of the second load/store that would > complete the gadget -- needs fixing and thus all these patches are > 'good', then yes, that makes sense. > > Given yours is the only response so far, I suspect we're good on all > that :-)
+1 from me for -stable.
