On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:05:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hurm.. I think this is also wrong. See how dequeue_rt_stack() is also
> called from the enqueue path. Also, nothing calls cpufreq_update_util()
> on the throttle path now.
> And talking about throttle; I think we wanted to check rt_queued in that
> case.

Bah, clearly you also want to update on unthrottle.. but I think there's
more buggered wrt throtteling.

Reply via email to