On 17-05-18, 21:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail
> unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> index 61f00d1cba26..147ae3e14f18 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>       { .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
>  };
>  
> -#define NUM_CPUS     2
> -
>  static struct clk *cpu_clk;
>  static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
>  static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
> @@ -119,9 +117,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS)
> -             return -EINVAL;
> -
>       clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
>  
>       /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to