On 30 May 2018 at 12:50, Patrick Bellasi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25-May 15:12, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index fb18bcc..967e873 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -7290,11 +7290,14 @@ static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq
>> *cfs_rq)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static inline bool rt_rq_has_blocked(struct rq *rq)
>> +static inline bool others_rqs_have_blocked(struct rq *rq)
>
> Here you are going to fold in IRQ's utilization which, strictly
> speaking, is not a RQ. Moreover, we are checking only utilization.
>
> Can we use a better matching name? E.g.
> others_have_blocked_util
> non_cfs_blocked_util
others_have_blocked looks ok and consistent with cfs_rq_has_blocked
> ?
>
>> {
>> if (rq->avg_rt.util_avg)
>> return true;
>>
>> + if (rq->avg_dl.util_avg)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> return false;
>> }
>>
> --
> #include <best/regards.h>
>
> Patrick Bellasi
