Looks good. It builds and seems to work in my testing.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve French" <>
To: "Stephen Rothwell" <>
Cc: "CIFS" <>, "Linux-Next Mailing List" 
<>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" 
<>, "Kees Cook" <>, "Ronnie 
Sahlberg" <>, "Aurelien Aptel" <>
Sent: Thursday, 14 June, 2018 10:40:43 AM
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cifs tree with Linus' tree


I fixed up that patch and repushed to cifs-2.6.git for-next.  Seems
trivial. Let me know if any issues.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell <> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Today's linux-next merge of the cifs tree got a conflict in:
>   fs/cifs/transport.c
> between commit:
>   6da2ec56059c ("treewide: kmalloc() -> kmalloc_array()")
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>   1560d69e21c6 ("cifs: push rfc1002 generation down the stack")
> from the cifs tree.
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to