On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:31:15 -0700 Joel Fernandes <joe...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > Think some more about this counter, I think you mean 'successes' as in > 'successful attempts' than 'successful test' ? If so, then perhaps you can > drop this patch. It wasn't clear to me what the 'successes' meant so I may > have been a bit misled into changing its meaning. If on the other hand, it > means 'successful test', then yes this patch would be Ok then. thanks! -Joel > In either case, it sounds like a comment should be added to clarify what n_barrier_successes actually means ;-) -- Steve
