On 06/26/2018 06:24 AM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Use huge_ptep_get to translate huge ptes to normal ptes so we can
> check them with the huge_pte_* functions. Otherwise some architectures
> will check the wrong values and will not wait for userspace to bring
> in the memory.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 369cd2121be4 ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: userfaultfd_huge_must_wait for 
> hugepmd ranges")

Adding linux-mm and Andrew on Cc:

Thanks for catching and fixing this.
I think this needs to be fixed in stable as well.  Correct?  Assuming
userfaultfd is/can be enabled for impacted architectures.

Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <[email protected]>
-- 
Mike Kravetz

> ---
>  fs/userfaultfd.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> index 123bf7d516fc..594d192b2331 100644
> --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -222,24 +222,26 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_huge_must_wait(struct 
> userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
>                                        unsigned long reason)
>  {
>       struct mm_struct *mm = ctx->mm;
> -     pte_t *pte;
> +     pte_t *ptep, pte;
>       bool ret = true;
>  
>       VM_BUG_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem));
>  
> -     pte = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, vma_mmu_pagesize(vma));
> -     if (!pte)
> +     ptep = huge_pte_offset(mm, address, vma_mmu_pagesize(vma));
> +
> +     if (!ptep)
>               goto out;
>  
>       ret = false;
> +     pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>  
>       /*
>        * Lockless access: we're in a wait_event so it's ok if it
>        * changes under us.
>        */
> -     if (huge_pte_none(*pte))
> +     if (huge_pte_none(pte))
>               ret = true;
> -     if (!huge_pte_write(*pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
> +     if (!huge_pte_write(pte) && (reason & VM_UFFD_WP))
>               ret = true;
>  out:
>       return ret;
> 

Reply via email to