On 06/28/18 14:03, Keith Busch wrote:
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 6 ++++++
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index b429d515b568..c6478833464d 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -466,6 +466,12 @@ struct request *blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx(struct
request_queue *q,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx);
+unsigned int blk_mq_request_hctx_idx(struct request *rq)
+{
+ return blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, rq->mq_ctx->cpu)->queue_num;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_request_hctx_idx);
+
static void __blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
{
struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index e3147eb74222..af91b2d31a04 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static inline u16 blk_mq_unique_tag_to_tag(u32 unique_tag)
}
When posting a patch series, please include a cover letter that explains
the purpose of the patch series.
Regarding the above patch: have you considered to use the existing
function blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq() instead of introducing this new
function?
Thanks,
Bart.
