On Saturday 30 June 2018 08:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:03:17 +0530
> Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
> 
>> Parent MFD device takes care of enabling ADC interface whenever
>> touchscreen is marked wakeup capable. Therefore, unconditionally disable
>> ADC interface during system suspend to save power in case of system with
>> just ADC and no TSC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>
> 
> This sounds like a sensible change to me.   Is it applicable without the
> rest of the series?  If so I'll take it through IIO.  If the answer
> is that it needs to go with the rest then
> 

This patch as such does not have any compile time dependencies on other
patches, but I would like Dmitry's opinion on the series before being
merged.

> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> 

Thanks!


Regards
Vignesh

> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 12 ++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c 
>> b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>> index 80df5a377d30..cafb1dcadc48 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
>> @@ -693,16 +693,12 @@ static int __maybe_unused tiadc_suspend(struct device 
>> *dev)
>>  {
>>      struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>      struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>> -    struct ti_tscadc_dev *tscadc_dev;
>>      unsigned int idle;
>>  
>> -    tscadc_dev = ti_tscadc_dev_get(to_platform_device(dev));
>> -    if (!device_may_wakeup(tscadc_dev->dev)) {
>> -            idle = tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_CTRL);
>> -            idle &= ~(CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB);
>> -            tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_CTRL, (idle |
>> -                            CNTRLREG_POWERDOWN));
>> -    }
>> +    idle = tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_CTRL);
>> +    idle &= ~(CNTRLREG_TSCSSENB);
>> +    tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_CTRL, (idle |
>> +                    CNTRLREG_POWERDOWN));
>>  
>>      return 0;
>>  }
> 

-- 
Regards
Vignesh

Reply via email to