On 11/07/2018 15:42, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 11/07/18 12:36, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 11/07/2018 13:24, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently, quite a few clockevent devices have cpumask set to
>>> cpu_all_mask which should be fine. However, cpu_possible_mask is more
>>> accurate and if there are any other clockevent devices in the system
>>> which have cpumask set to cpu_possible_mask, then having cpu_all_mask
>>> may result in issues (mostly boot hang with forever loops in
>>> clockevents_notify_released).
>>>
>>> So, lets replace all the clockevent device cpu_all_mask to
>>> cpu_possible_mask in order to prevent above mentioned possible issue.
>>>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
>>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssant...@kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Applied, thanks for the fix.
>>
> 
> Thomas was planning to take this, see [1]

Thomas ?

Do you want to take all the series ? Or shall I take this one ?


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Reply via email to