On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 04:57:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > It might be simple to model, but I worry this weakens our locking > implementations to a point where they will not be understood by the average > kernel developer. As I've said before, I would prefer "full" RCsc locking,
Another vote for RCsc locks. The (in)famous hold-out is of course PowerPC, but it now looks like RISC-V is following where they I really rather wish they didn't.
