On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:42:22PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I figured out a fix and pushed it to the 'ida' branch in
> > git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git
> 
> Great, thanks a lot for sorting that out so quickly. But I've cloned
> the tree and don't see today's patch, so assume you've folded the fix
> into an existing commit? If possible, please append the diff of today's
> fix to this thread so that we can try it out. Or if that's difficult,
> please at least tell which files were modified, then I can probably
> work it out from the diff of those files against mmotm.

Sure!  It's just this:

diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c
index 32a9c2a6a9e9..383c410997eb 100644
--- a/lib/xarray.c
+++ b/lib/xarray.c
@@ -660,6 +660,8 @@ void xas_create_range(struct xa_state *xas)
        unsigned char sibs = xas->xa_sibs;
 
        xas->xa_index |= ((sibs + 1) << shift) - 1;
+       if (!xas_top(xas->xa_node) && xas->xa_node->shift == xas->xa_shift)
+               xas->xa_offset |= sibs;
        xas->xa_shift = 0;
        xas->xa_sibs = 0;
 

The only other things changed are the test suite, and removing an
unnecessary change, so they can be ignored:

diff --git a/lib/test_xarray.c b/lib/test_xarray.c
index 8a67d4bb1788..ec06c3ca19e9 100644
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -695,19 +695,20 @@ static noinline void check_move(struct xarray *xa)
                check_move_small(xa, (1UL << i) - 1);
 }
 
-static noinline void check_create_range_1(struct xarray *xa,
+static noinline void xa_store_many_order(struct xarray *xa,
                unsigned long index, unsigned order)
 {
        XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, order);
-       unsigned int i;
+       unsigned int i = 0;
 
        do {
                xas_lock(&xas);
+               XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find_conflict(&xas));
                xas_create_range(&xas);
                if (xas_error(&xas))
                        goto unlock;
                for (i = 0; i < (1U << order); i++) {
-                       xas_store(&xas, xa + i);
+                       XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(index + i)));
                        xas_next(&xas);
                }
 unlock:
@@ -715,7 +716,29 @@ static noinline void check_create_range_1(struct xarray 
*xa,
        } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
 
        XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas));
-       xa_destroy(xa);
+}
+
+static noinline void check_create_range_1(struct xarray *xa,
+               unsigned long index, unsigned order)
+{
+       unsigned long i;
+
+       xa_store_many_order(xa, index, order);
+       for (i = index; i < index + (1UL << order); i++)
+               xa_erase_value(xa, i);
+       XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
+}
+
+static noinline void check_create_range_2(struct xarray *xa, unsigned order)
+{
+       unsigned long i;
+       unsigned long nr = 1UL << order;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < nr * nr; i += nr)
+               xa_store_many_order(xa, i, order);
+       for (i = 0; i < nr * nr; i++)
+               xa_erase_value(xa, i);
+       XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
 }
 
 static noinline void check_create_range(struct xarray *xa)
@@ -729,6 +752,8 @@ static noinline void check_create_range(struct xarray *xa)
                check_create_range_1(xa, 2U << order, order);
                check_create_range_1(xa, 3U << order, order);
                check_create_range_1(xa, 1U << 24, order);
+               if (order < 10)
+                       check_create_range_2(xa, order);
        }
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index af2d7fa05af7..3ac507803787 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -589,8 +589,8 @@ static int shmem_add_to_page_cache(struct page *page,
        VM_BUG_ON(expected && PageTransHuge(page));
 
        page_ref_add(page, nr);
-       page->index = index;
        page->mapping = mapping;
+       page->index = index;
 
        do {
                void *entry;

Reply via email to