On 08/06, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:07:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 08/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > But, with or without this fix, shouldn't we set .disabled = 1 if > > > modify_() fails? > > > IIUC this doesn't matter, bp->attr.disabled is not really used anyway, > > > but looks a > > > bit confusing. > > > > I am looking at another caller perf_event_modify_breakpoint(). It too > > doesn't set > > attr.disabled = 1 on failure, it does _perf_event_enable() instead so > > attr.disabled > > should be correct. > > > > But this looks wrong. If modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check() paths fails after > > arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings() was called, then we can not simply restore > > hum, arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings was removed recently.. r u checking the > last sources?
I do not see this change in Linus's tree... Nevermind, if this was already changed/fixed somewhere, please forget. Oleg.
