On 11.08.2018 18:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:31:27PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote: >> ARM stack unwinding is upstream since 2009 and has been proven >> working well. At this time it is the preferred stack unwinding >> support since it also supports Thumb 2. Do not scare people >> and drop the EXPERIMENTAL mark. > > Actually, there are still cases where we're missing the annotations - > I've seen them in various oops dumps, but I forget where they are. > What I do remember is that they didn't seem trivial to fix at the > time, so it's still recommended that frame pointers are used if you > want to guarantee getting a debuggable oops dump.
Ok, but does that warrants the experimental mark? Experimental sounds rather harsh to me. People might disable it because of that... I'd rather have a >90% chance of having a good stack trace than none at all. -- Stefan
