On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:44:43 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > If I recall correctly, this subterfuge suppresses compiler complaints > > > about initializing an unsigned long with a negative number. :-/ > > > > Did you try: > > > > .srcu_gp_seq_needed = -1UL, > > > > ? > > Works for my compiler, not sure what set of complaints pushed me in that > direction. I've used -1UL for unsigned long initializations for pretty much my entire programming career. I've never had any issues with it. -- Steve
