On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:54:49 +0200 Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 10:16 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> Does the SIE complain if you specify a control > >> domain that the host does not have access to (I'd guess so)? > > > > The SIE does not complain if you specify a domain to which the host - or a > > lower level guest - does not have access. The firmware performs a logical > > AND of the guest's and hosts's - or lower level guest's - APMs, AQMs and > > ADMs > > Rather a bit-wise AND, I guess (of the same type masks corresponding to Guest > 1 and > Guest 2). The result of a logical AND is a logical value (true or false) as > far as I remember. > > > to create effective masks EAPM, EAQM and EADM. Only devices corresponding to > > the bits set in the EAPM, EAQM and EADM will be accessible by the guest. > > I'm not sure what is the intended meaning of 'the SIE complains'. If it means > getting out of (SIE when interpreting lets say an NQAP under the discussed > circumstances) with some sort of error code, I think Tony's answer, ' SIE > does not complain' > makes a lot of sense. It's the guest that's is trying to stretch further than > the blanket reaches, and it's the guest that needs to be educated on this > fact. Yep, that's what I meant. If the hypervisor can call the SIE with that config, but the guest gets an error if it tries to use something that it cannot use, that's fine.
