On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:14:16 +0200
Jann Horn <[email protected]> wrote:

> The opaque plumbing of #GP from do_general_protection() through
> notify_die() into kprobe_exceptions_notify() makes it hard to understand
> what's going on.

OK, this seems reasonable optimization, since kprobe_exceptions_notify
only handles DIE_GPF now.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>

Hmm, I think I should introduce ARCH_KPROBE_HANDLE_EXCEPTION and if it
is enabled, kernel/kprobes.c stops using exception notifier. It is
no more needed on x86.

Thank you!

> 
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 31 +------------------------------
>  arch/x86/kernel/traps.c        | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index b0d1e81c96bb..467ac22691b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -1028,42 +1028,13 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int 
> trapnr)
>               if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
>                       return 1;
>  
> -             /*
> -              * fixup routine could not handle it,
> -              * Let do_page_fault() fix it.
> -              */
> +             /* fixup routine could not handle it. */
>       }
>  
>       return 0;
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_fault_handler);
>  
> -/*
> - * Wrapper routine for handling exceptions.
> - */
> -int kprobe_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val,
> -                          void *data)
> -{
> -     struct die_args *args = data;
> -     int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
> -
> -     if (args->regs && user_mode(args->regs))
> -             return ret;
> -
> -     if (val == DIE_GPF) {
> -             /*
> -              * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to
> -              * trust the result from kprobe_running(), we have
> -              * be non-preemptible.
> -              */
> -             if (!preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
> -                 kprobe_fault_handler(args->regs, args->trapnr))
> -                     ret = NOTIFY_STOP;
> -     }
> -     return ret;
> -}
> -NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_exceptions_notify);
> -
>  bool arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
>  {
>       bool is_in_entry_trampoline_section = false;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index e6db475164ed..bf9ab1aaa175 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -556,6 +556,16 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long 
> error_code)
>  
>               tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
>               tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_GP;
> +
> +             /*
> +              * To be potentially processing a kprobe fault and to
> +              * trust the result from kprobe_running(), we have to
> +              * be non-preemptible.
> +              */
> +             if (!preemptible() && kprobe_running() &&
> +                 kprobe_fault_handler(regs, X86_TRAP_GP))
> +                     return;
> +
>               if (notify_die(DIE_GPF, "general protection fault", regs, 
> error_code,
>                              X86_TRAP_GP, SIGSEGV) != NOTIFY_STOP)
>                       die("general protection fault", regs, error_code);
> -- 
> 2.19.0.rc0.228.g281dcd1b4d0-goog
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>

Reply via email to