Hi All,
The email for Ivan is no longer valid. Can anyone else help me with
my question?
Thanks,
Frank
On 08/31/18 15:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
>
>
> On 02/03/15 04:17, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter configuration nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iiva...@mm-sol.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> index 1f130bc..dbedf64 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> @@ -226,5 +226,21 @@
>> clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> status = "disabled";
>> };
>> +
>> + spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> + reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> + reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
>> + interrupts = <0 190 0>;> + qcom,ee
>> = <0>;
>> + qcom,channel = <0>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> index e265ec1..2d11641 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -247,5 +247,21 @@
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> };
>> +
>> + spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> + reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> + reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> + <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
>
>> + interrupts = <0 190 0>;
>
> The final value in this interrupts property means IRQ_TYPE_NONE.
>
> A WARN_ON() was added early this year to complain about use of
> IRQ_TYPE_NONE: 83a86fbb5b56 "irqchip/gic: Loudly complain about
> the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE", resulting in many warnings spewing
> forth when I boot an APQ8074 Dragonboard. I am trying to
> determine whether the warning is overly aggressive, or whether
> the IRQ TYPE is incorrectly specified for the spmi node.
>
> The interrupt-parent for the spmi node is intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000,
> which has compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2". I do not know the architecture
> or implementation of this interrupt controller. Is an IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> valid in this case, or should a specific type be provided?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Frank
>
>
>> + qcom,ee = <0>;
>> + qcom,channel = <0>;
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> .
>
