On Thu 06-09-18 15:53:34, Shuah Khan wrote: [...] > A few critical allocations could be satisfied and root cgroup prevails. It is > not the > intent to have exclusivity at the expense of the kernel.
Well, it is not "few critical allocations". It can be a lot of memory. Basically any GFP_KERNEL allocation. So how exactly you expect this to work when you cannot estimate how much memory will kernel eat? > > This feature will allow a way to configure cpusets on non-NUMA for workloads > that can > benefit from the reservation and isolation that is available within the > constraints of > exclusive cpuset policies. AFAIR this was the first approach Google took for the memory isolation and they moved over to memory cgroups. I would recommend to talk to those guys bebfore you introduce potentially a lot of code that will not really work for the workload you indend it for. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs