On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:05:29AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > From: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]> > > It's a bit confusing exactly what this function does: it actually > returns the hartid of an OF processor node, failing with -1 on invalid > nodes. I've changed the name to _hartid() in order to make that a bit > more clear, as well as adding a comment. > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Looks generally good, but it is going to conflict with the dt iterators series from Rob. Given that this is just a little cleanup it might be worth deferring until the next merge window. Otherwise looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
