Hi Heiko, On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:22:26PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam: > > Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited. > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasi...@linaro.org> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > > index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings > > Required root node properties: > > - compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399"; > > > > +- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition) > > + Required root node properties: > > + - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399"; > > hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs? > Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable. >
Not that I'm aware of but the intention was to follow other RK3399 based boards. Anyhow, I have no issues with "vamrs,rock960" if you prefer it! Thanks, Mani > > Heiko > >
