platform_driver_register will set the .owner field. So it is safe
to remove the redundant assignment.

The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongji...@huawei.com>
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt2701/mt2701-wm8960.c | 1 -
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt6797/mt6797-mt6351.c | 1 -
 sound/soc/rockchip/rk3288_hdmi_analog.c   | 1 -
 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt2701/mt2701-wm8960.c 
b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt2701/mt2701-wm8960.c
index 89f34ef..e5d49e6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt2701/mt2701-wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt2701/mt2701-wm8960.c
@@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ static int mt2701_wm8960_machine_probe(struct 
platform_device *pdev)
 static struct platform_driver mt2701_wm8960_machine = {
        .driver = {
                .name = "mt2701-wm8960",
-               .owner = THIS_MODULE,
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
                .of_match_table = mt2701_wm8960_machine_dt_match,
 #endif
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt6797/mt6797-mt6351.c 
b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt6797/mt6797-mt6351.c
index b1558c5..6e578e8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt6797/mt6797-mt6351.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt6797/mt6797-mt6351.c
@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ static int mt6797_mt6351_dev_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
 static struct platform_driver mt6797_mt6351_driver = {
        .driver = {
                .name = "mt6797-mt6351",
-               .owner = THIS_MODULE,
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
                .of_match_table = mt6797_mt6351_dt_match,
 #endif
diff --git a/sound/soc/rockchip/rk3288_hdmi_analog.c 
b/sound/soc/rockchip/rk3288_hdmi_analog.c
index 929b3fe..a472d5e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/rockchip/rk3288_hdmi_analog.c
+++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rk3288_hdmi_analog.c
@@ -286,7 +286,6 @@ static int snd_rk_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        .probe = snd_rk_mc_probe,
        .driver = {
                .name = DRV_NAME,
-               .owner = THIS_MODULE,
                .pm = &snd_soc_pm_ops,
                .of_match_table = rockchip_sound_of_match,
        },
-- 
1.7.12.4

Reply via email to