Hi Suzuki,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Switch to updated coresight bindings for hw ports
> 
> Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gr...@linaro.org>
> Cc: David Brown <david.br...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.iva...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 98 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> index 7b32b89..5bed52b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> @@ -1099,10 +1099,11 @@
>                       clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_QDSS_CLK>, <&rpmcc RPM_QDSS_A_CLK>;
>                       clock-names = "apb_pclk", "atclk";
>  
> -                     port {
> -                             tpiu_in: endpoint {
> -                                     slave-mode;
> -                                     remote-endpoint = <&replicator_out1>;
> +                     out-ports {

Here should be in-ports for tpiu node?

BTW, if upper comment is valid, this means the DT binding doc also
gives wrong example for tpiu node [1].

I tested this patch with upper changing to 'in-ports', etm with perf
mode can work well on DB410c board.

[...]

Thanks,
Leo Yan

[1] 
https://git.linaro.org/kernel/coresight.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt?h=next#n135

Reply via email to