Hi Oleg! While been testing criu with linux-next we've triggered a BUG.
https://api.travis-ci.org/v3/job/430308998/log.txt
[ 2.461618] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
security/apparmor/include/cred.h:154
[ 2.461794] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 152, name: init
[ 2.461890] 1 lock held by init/152:
[ 2.461981] #0: 00000000f30c3fda (tasklist_lock){.+.+}, at:
ptrace_traceme+0x1c/0x70
[ 2.462114] irq event stamp: 2524
[ 2.462242] hardirqs last enabled at (2523): [<ffffffff98002922>]
do_syscall_64+0x12/0x190
[ 2.462363] hardirqs last disabled at (2524): [<ffffffff98b8b02f>]
_raw_write_lock_irq+0xf/0x40
[ 2.462476] softirqs last enabled at (1904): [<ffffffff98ac79ef>]
unix_sock_destructor+0x4f/0xc0
[ 2.462586] softirqs last disabled at (1902): [<ffffffff98ac79ef>]
unix_sock_destructor+0x4f/0xc0
[ 2.462697] CPU: 1 PID: 152 Comm: init Not tainted 4.19.0-rc4-next-20180918+
#1
Which is due to commit
commit 4b105cbbaf7c06e01c27391957dc3c446328d087
Author: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Jun 17 16:27:33 2009 -0700
ptrace: do not use task_lock() for attach
because now after write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); apparmor calls for
traceme and
static inline struct aa_label *begin_current_label_crit_section(void)
{
struct aa_label *label = aa_current_raw_label();
--> might_sleep();
Take a look please, once time permit.
Cyrill
