On 10/06/2018 03:37 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > Significant concern has been expressed about the responsibilities outlined in > the enforcement clause of the new code of conduct. Since there is concern > that this becomes binding on the release of the 4.19 kernel, strip the > enforcement clauses to give the community time to consider and debate how this > should be handled. > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> > --- > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 15 --------------- > 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > index aa40e34e7785..4dd90987305b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst > @@ -59,21 +59,6 @@ address, posting via an official social media account, or > acting as an appointed > representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project > may be > further defined and clarified by project maintainers. > > -Enforcement > -=========== > - > -Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be > -reported by contacting the Technical Advisory Board (TAB) at > -<t...@lists.linux-foundation.org>. All complaints will be reviewed and > -investigated and will result in a response that is deemed necessary and > -appropriate to the circumstances. The TAB is obligated to maintain > -confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further details > of > -specific enforcement policies may be posted separately. > - > -Maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith > may > -face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of > the > -project’s leadership. > - > Attribution > =========== > >
With the assumption that the enforcement details will be added later after community discussion in upcoming releases. Acked-by: Shuah Khan <sh...@kernel.org> thanks, -- Shuah