On (10/09/18 10:39), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> > > --- > > kernel/printk/printk.c | 10 +++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > The patch makes perfect sense. It looks a bit hacky but I can't > think about any less hacky one. > > I wonder if it is worth it. But if nobody else is against it > I am going to push it.
Well, getting to buffered printk may take some time; so I'd probably
apply it, shouldn't hurt :)
-ss
