From: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>

Let's document the magic a bit, especially why device_hotplug_lock is
required when adding/removing memory and how it all play together with
requests to online/offline memory from user space.

[ rppt: moved the text to Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst ]

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: John Allen <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <[email protected]>
Cc: Len Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Neuling <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <[email protected]>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
---
 Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst 
b/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
index a99f2f2..de7467e 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
@@ -85,3 +85,41 @@ MEM_ONLINE, or MEM_OFFLINE action to cancel hotplugging. It 
stops
 further processing of the notification queue.
 
 NOTIFY_STOP stops further processing of the notification queue.
+
+Locking Internals
+=================
+
+When adding/removing memory that uses memory block devices (i.e. ordinary RAM),
+the device_hotplug_lock should be held to:
+
+- synchronize against online/offline requests (e.g. via sysfs). This way, 
memory
+  block devices can only be accessed (.online/.state attributes) by user
+  space once memory has been fully added. And when removing memory, we
+  know nobody is in critical sections.
+- synchronize against CPU hotplug and similar (e.g. relevant for ACPI and PPC)
+
+Especially, there is a possible lock inversion that is avoided using
+device_hotplug_lock when adding memory and user space tries to online that
+memory faster than expected:
+
+- device_online() will first take the device_lock(), followed by
+  mem_hotplug_lock
+- add_memory_resource() will first take the mem_hotplug_lock, followed by
+  the device_lock() (while creating the devices, during bus_add_device()).
+
+As the device is visible to user space before taking the device_lock(), this
+can result in a lock inversion.
+
+onlining/offlining of memory should be done via device_online()/
+device_offline() - to make sure it is properly synchronized to actions
+via sysfs. Holding device_hotplug_lock is advised (to e.g. protect online_type)
+
+When adding/removing/onlining/offlining memory or adding/removing
+heterogeneous/device memory, we should always hold the mem_hotplug_lock in
+write mode to serialise memory hotplug (e.g. access to global/zone
+variables).
+
+In addition, mem_hotplug_lock (in contrast to device_hotplug_lock) in read
+mode allows for a quite efficient get_online_mems/put_online_mems
+implementation, so code accessing memory can protect from that memory
+vanishing.
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to