Hi Nava,

On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 14:11 +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> Add a reset controller driver for Xilinx Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC.
> The zynqmp reset-controller has the ability to reset lines
> connected to different blocks and peripheral in the Soc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes for v1:
>               -None.

I had comments on RFC v3 that are not addressed yet, see below.

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-zynqmp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Xilinx, Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>

Unnecessary.

[...]
> +static int zynqmp_reset_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +                            unsigned long id)
> +{
> +     struct zynqmp_reset_data *priv = to_zynqmp_reset_data(rcdev);
> +     int val, err;
> +
> +     err = priv->eemi_ops->reset_get_status(ZYNQMP_RESET_ID + id, &val);
> +     if (!err)
> +             return -EINVAL;

Should return error code, and only if there is an error:

        if (err)
                return err;

> +     return val;
> +}
> +
> +static int zynqmp_reset_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> +                           unsigned long id)
> +{
> +     struct zynqmp_reset_data *priv = to_zynqmp_reset_data(rcdev);
> +
> +     return priv->eemi_ops->reset_assert(ZYNQMP_RESET_ID + id,
> +                                         PM_RESET_ACTION_PULSE);
> +}
> +
> +static struct reset_control_ops zynqmp_reset_ops = {

Should be const:

        static const struct reset_control_ops zynqmp_reset_ops = {

> +     .reset = zynqmp_reset_reset,
> +     .assert = zynqmp_reset_assert,
> +     .deassert = zynqmp_reset_deassert,
> +     .status = zynqmp_reset_status,
> +};
> +
> +static int zynqmp_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct zynqmp_reset_data *priv;
> +
> +     priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> +                         sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);

Fits on one line:

        priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);

regards
Philipp

Reply via email to