Hi Suman,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com>
> Sent: mardi 23 octobre 2018 18:51
> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.palla...@st.com>; bjorn.anders...@linaro.org;
> o...@wizery.com
> Cc: linux-remotep...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>;
> benjamin.gaign...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/17] remoteproc: add rproc_va_to_pa function
>
> Hi Loic, Bjorn,
>
> On 7/27/18 8:14 AM, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> > This new function translates CPU virtual address in
> > CPU physical one according to virtual address location.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.palla...@st.com>
> > Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > index 437fabf..8e5fe1e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > @@ -140,6 +140,22 @@ static void rproc_disable_iommu(struct rproc
> *rproc)
> > iommu_domain_free(domain);
> > }
> >
> > +static phys_addr_t rproc_va_to_pa(void *cpu_addr)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Return physical address according to virtual address location
> > + * - in vmalloc: if region ioremapped or defined as
> dma_alloc_coherent
> > + * - in kernel: if region allocated in generic dma memory pool
> > + */
> > + if (is_vmalloc_addr(cpu_addr)) {
> > + return page_to_phys(vmalloc_to_page(cpu_addr)) +
> > + offset_in_page(cpu_addr);
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!virt_addr_valid(cpu_addr));
> > + return virt_to_phys(cpu_addr);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * rproc_da_to_va() - lookup the kernel virtual address for a remoteproc
> address
> > * @rproc: handle of a remote processor
> > @@ -711,7 +727,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_carveout(struct rproc
> *rproc,
> > * In this case, the device address and the physical address
> > * are the same.
> > */
> > - rsc->pa = dma;
> > + rsc->pa = (u32)rproc_va_to_pa(va);
>
> While I agree with the direction here, we ought to add a check here
> warning users if some address bits are getting lost as a result of the
> typecast. Granted the issue may have been present previously with
> dma_addr_t as well, but most platforms were using 32-bit dma addresses,
> so this was kinda masked. There are ARMv7 platforms with LPAE enabled
> allowing physical addresses > 32-bits.
>
> In anycase, we definitely have a need for a v2 for the fw_rsc_carveout
> structure to deal with 64-bit addresses.
>
Agree with you.
Assumption for this series was to keep resource table as it is. Resource table
improvement is planned in a second step.
Regards,
Loic
> regards
> Suman
>
> >
> > carveout->va = va;
> > carveout->len = rsc->len;
> >
