‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 7:10 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 30-10-18 19:56, Mogens Jensen wrote: > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:04 PM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > On 30-10-18 16:46, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > On 30-10-18 16:04, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > > > > > In addition I am not aware of any baytrail device using plt_clk_0, so > > > > > moving a common machine driver such a cht_bsw_max98090_ti to use > > > > > plt_clk0 only would break other devices (e.g. Rambi/Orco). Asking for > > > > > both clocks to be on might work though, > > > > > > > > Ok, so we need to have a DMI based quirk for the Swanky and maybe also > > > > the clapper to use plt_clk_0 there. Asking for 2 clks if we only need > > > > one does not seem like a good plan. > > > > > > Dean, Mogens, > > > To write a proper patch for this I'm going to need DMI strings > > > from your devices. > > > Can you please run (as normal user): > > > grep . /sys/class/dmi/id/* 2> /dev/null > > > And reply with the output of this command? > > > I have attached the output from a coreboot seabios based clapper. > > Thank you. > > > Should I still test > > 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch with > > SND_SOC_INTEL_CHT_BSW_MAX98090_TI_MACH and asoundrc from Dean? There seems > > to have been some development in the case since that request was made. > > Yes please test that, I expect that to also fix things for the > Clapper, but I need to have that confirmed before submitting a > patch upstream adding a quirk for the Clapper to use pmc_plt_clk_0 > instead of pmc_plt_clk_3. > > Regards, > > Hans > Unfortunately I only have access to longterm kernel 4.14 for building/running on this system, and 0001-ASoC-intel-cht_bsw_max98090_ti-Use-pmc_plt_clk_0-ins.patch does not patch against 4.14.78. Can a test patch for 4.14 be created? Regards, Mogens
