On 07/11/2018 20:48, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > index 375226055a413..5b33985d9f475 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ void fpu__resume_cpu(void) > * > * Note: does not work for compacted buffers. > */
The comment is wrong, which was already the case before but it becomes a bit more important if the function is used outside its module. However, why not use get_xsave_addr? I don't see why it is important to skip the checks, and if it is it probably deserves a comment. "Raw" and double underscores in the function name is scary... Paolo > -static void *__raw_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr) > +void *__raw_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr) > { > if (!xfeature_enabled(xfeature_nr)) { > WARN_ON_FPU(1);