On 11/9/18 8:47 PM, Darryl T. Agostinelli wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:16:07PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 11/9/18 8:00 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:12:09 +0100 Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Multiple people have reported the following sparse warning:
>>>>
>>>> ./include/linux/slab.h:332:43: warning: dubious: x & !y
>>>>
>>>> The minimal fix would be to change the logical & to boolean &&, which
>>>> emits the
>>>> same code, but Andrew has suggested that the branch-avoiding tricks are
>>>> maybe
>>>> not worthwile. David Laight provided a nice comparison of disassembly of
>>>> multiple variants, which shows that the current version produces a 4 deep
>>>> dependency chain, and fixing the sparse warning by changing logical and to
>>>> multiplication emits an IMUL, making it even more expensive.
>>>>
>>>> The code as rewritten by this patch yielded the best disassembly, with a
>>>> single
>>>> predictable branch for the most common case, and a ternary operator for the
>>>> rest, which gcc seems to compile without a branch or cmov by itself.
>>>>
>>>> The result should be more readable, without a sparse warning and probably
>>>> also
>>>> faster for the common case.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
>>>> Reported-by: Darryl T. Agostinelli <dagostine...@gmail.com>
>>>> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> Suggested-by: David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com>
>>>> Fixes: 1291523f2c1d ("mm, slab/slub: introduce kmalloc-reclaimable caches")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
>>>> ---
>>>> include/linux/slab.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>>>> index 918f374e7156..18c6920c2803 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>>>> @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ enum kmalloc_cache_type {
>>>> KMALLOC_RECLAIM,
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
>>>> KMALLOC_DMA,
>>>> +#else
>>>> + KMALLOC_DMA = KMALLOC_NORMAL,
>>>> #endif
>>>> NR_KMALLOC_TYPES
>>>> };
>>>
>>> I don't think this works correctly. Resetting KMALLOC_DMA to 0 will
>>> cause NR_KMALLOC_TYPES to have value 1.
>>
>> Doh, right! Thanks for catching this.
>>
>> This? Not terribly elegant, but I don't see a nicer way right now...
>>
>
> How about the solution I proposed yesterday?
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/9/750
>
> It doesn't involve any tricks.
It doesn't remove the "trick" that calculates return value as a sum of
booleans multiplying constants. The patch converts one part of the
expression of those booleans to a ternary operator. I think the result
is even harder to follow and meanwhile Andrew's suggestion was to remove
all the tricks.
> As it is, this sparse warning is begging for a trick. Let's not
> oblidge it to much.
The sparse warning could be silenced just by changing '&' to '&&' which
would emit the same code. But we decided to untrick the code.
