From: Lance Roy <ldr...@gmail.com>

lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it only checks if the current thread holds the lock regardless of
whether someone else does. This is also a step towards possibly removing
spin_is_locked().

Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr...@gmail.com>
Cc: Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-driv...@solarflare.com>
Cc: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
Cc: Bert Kenward <bkenw...@solarflare.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: <net...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
index 98fe7e762e17..3643015a55cf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
@@ -3167,7 +3167,7 @@ struct hlist_head *efx_rps_hash_bucket(struct efx_nic 
*efx,
 {
        u32 hash = efx_filter_spec_hash(spec);
 
-       WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&efx->rps_hash_lock));
+       lockdep_assert_held(&efx->rps_hash_lock);
        if (!efx->rps_hash_table)
                return NULL;
        return &efx->rps_hash_table[hash % EFX_ARFS_HASH_TABLE_SIZE];
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to