On 11/06/2018 10:34 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> _get_optimal_vdd_voltage call provides new_supply_vbb->u_volt
> as the reference voltage while it should be really new_supply_vdd->u_volt.
>
> Fixes: 9a835fa6e47 ("PM / OPP: Add ti-opp-supply driver")
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <[email protected]>
> ---
Acked-by: Dave Gerlach <[email protected]>
Currently all corresponding vbb and vdd values provided by the device tree match
which is why this does not fail, but this was a typo by me and vdd is the
correct value to actually use.
Regards,
Dave
> drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> index 29e08a4..3f4fb4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/ti-opp-supply.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int ti_opp_supply_set_opp(struct
> dev_pm_set_opp_data *data)
> int ret;
>
> vdd_uv = _get_optimal_vdd_voltage(dev, &opp_data,
> - new_supply_vbb->u_volt);
> + new_supply_vdd->u_volt);
>
> if (new_supply_vdd->u_volt_min < vdd_uv)
> new_supply_vdd->u_volt_min = vdd_uv;
>
