On 23.11.18 13:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 23-11-18 13:37:40, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> User space should always be in charge of how to online memory and
>> if memory should be onlined automatically in the kernel. Let's drop the
>> parameter to overwrite this - XEN passes memhp_auto_online, just like
>> add_memory(), so we can directly use that instead internally.
> 
> Heh, I wanted to get rid of memhp_auto_online so much and now we have it
> in the core memory_hotplug. Not a win on my side I would say :/

That is actually a good point: Can we remove memhp_auto_online or is it
already some sort of kernel ABI?

(as it is exported via /sys/devices/system/memory/auto_online_blocks)

> On the other hand this can be seen as a cleanup because it removes that
> ambiguity that some callers might be unaware of the memhp_auto_online
> leading to a different behavior.

I would say this patch is a step into the right direction - remove the
flag from the interfaces, then drop it (eventually, as stated not sure
if that train has left the station).

> 
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.de>
>> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatas...@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
>> Cc: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>
>> Cc: Arun KS <aru...@codeaurora.org>
>> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org>
>> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to