Quoting Doug Anderson (2018-11-26 16:35:50)
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 2:35 AM Taniya Das <t...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > This adds the video clock controller node to sdm845 based on the examples
> > in the bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <t...@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > index b72bdb0..91a281b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sdm845.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,videocc-sdm845.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-qcom-qusb2.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-aoss.h>
> > @@ -1256,6 +1257,13 @@
> > #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + videocc: clock-controller@ab00000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-videocc";
> > + reg = <0xab00000 0x10000>;
> > + #clock-cells = <1>;
> > + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>
> Any reason not to include "#reset-cells = <1>;" here? The bindings
> list it as optional but I see no reason why we should leave it off.
> The file "include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,videocc-sdm845.h" seems to
> include some #defines for resets. Even though the driver doesn't seem
> like it supports it yet, it still should be fine to list it here.
We should update the binding to make it a required property. It doesn't
make any sense why that property would be optional given that the
hardware either has support for resets or it doesn't.
