On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 15:48:07 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Em Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:45:22PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <[email protected]>
> > 
> > In the case that a bprintk event has a dereferenced pointer that is stored
> > as a string, and there's more values to process (more args), the arg was not
> > updated to point to the next arg after processing the dereferenced pointer,
> > and it screwed up what was to be displayed.  
> 
> Thanks, applied.
>  
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Fixes: 7db96bb49629 ("tools lib traceevent: Handle new pointer processing 
> > of bprint strings")  

Arnaldo,

It seems that I cut and pasted the sha1 of the "fixes" part wrong. Can
you add a "3". That is, the above should have been: 37db96bb49629

Thanks,

-- Steve

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c 
> > b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > index 3692f29fee46..70144b98141c 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> > @@ -4970,6 +4970,7 @@ static void pretty_print(struct trace_seq *s, void 
> > *data, int size, struct tep_e
> >  
> >                             if (arg->type == TEP_PRINT_BSTRING) {
> >                                     trace_seq_puts(s, arg->string.string);
> > +                                   arg = arg->next;
> >                                     break;
> >                             }
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.19.1  
> 

Reply via email to