Commit-ID:  7f3c7952d111ac93573fb86f4d5aeff527a07fcc
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/7f3c7952d111ac93573fb86f4d5aeff527a07fcc
Author:     Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:11:29 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:54:50 +0100

tools/lib/lockdep: Rename "trywlock" into "trywrlock"

This patch avoids that the following compiler warning is reported while
compiling the lockdep unit tests:

include/liblockdep/rwlock.h: In function 'liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock':
include/liblockdep/rwlock.h:66:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'pthread_rwlock_trywlock'; did you mean 'pthread_rwlock_trywrlock'? 
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  return pthread_rwlock_trywlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         pthread_rwlock_trywrlock

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com>
Cc: johannes.b...@intel.com
Cc: t...@kernel.org
Fixes: 5a52c9b480e0 ("liblockdep: Add public headers for pthread_rwlock_t 
implementation")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181207011148.251812-6-bvanass...@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h 
b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
index a96c3bf0fef1..365762e3a1ea 100644
--- a/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
+++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ static inline int 
liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_
        return pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
 }
 
-static inline int 
liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+static inline int 
liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
 {
        lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, 0, 1, NULL, (unsigned long)_RET_IP_);
-       return pthread_rwlock_trywlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
+       return pthread_rwlock_trywrlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
 }
 
 static inline int liblockdep_rwlock_destroy(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline int 
liblockdep_rwlock_destroy(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
 #define pthread_rwlock_unlock          liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_unlock
 #define pthread_rwlock_wrlock          liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_wrlock
 #define pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock       liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock
-#define pthread_rwlock_trywlock                
liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_trywrlock       liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywrlock
 #define pthread_rwlock_destroy         liblockdep_rwlock_destroy
 
 #endif

Reply via email to