Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack

[James Morse]

Hi Steve,

On 15/12/2018 03:00, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:09:35 +0000
> James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com> wrote:
>> I gave this branch a spin, but I hit the WARN_ON() fairly easily:
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> 
> Can you see if this patch fixes it for you?

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> index d4f04f0ca646..8dfd5021b933 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fgraph.c
> @@ -246,10 +246,10 @@ unsigned long ftrace_return_to_handler(unsigned long 
> frame_pointer)
>  struct ftrace_ret_stack *
>  ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(struct task_struct *task, int idx)
>  {
> -     idx = current->curr_ret_stack - idx;
> +     idx = task->curr_ret_stack - idx;
>  
>       if (idx >= 0 && idx <= task->curr_ret_stack)
> -             return &current->ret_stack[idx];
> +             return &task->ret_stack[idx];
>  
>       return NULL;
>  }
> 

Heh, yes that fixes it:

Tested-by: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com>


Thanks,

James