On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 18:13, Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:02:29PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > As far as I can tell, the SGI x86 UV platforms still rely on this, so > > we're stuck with it for the foreseeable future. > > What happened with the old apple laptops which couldn't handle high > virtual mappings and needed 1:1? We don't care anymore? >
If that is the case (I wouldn't know) then yes, there is a second reason why we need to keep this code.
