> On Dec 24, 2018, at 12:49 AM, Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> wrote:
>
> [Cc-ing mailing list and people involved in the original patch]
>
> On Fri 21-12-18 13:42:24, Paul Oppenheimer wrote:
>> Hello! I've never reported a kernel bug before, and since its on the
>> "next" tree I was told to email the author of the relevant commit.
>> Please redirect me to the correct place if I've made a mistake.
>>
>> When opening firefox or chrome, and using it for a good 7 seconds, it
>> hangs in "uninterruptible sleep" and I recieve a "BUG" in dmesg. This
>> doesn't occur when reverting this commit:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=48cf516f8c.
>> Ive attached the output of decode_stacktrace.sh and the relevant dmesg
>> log to this email.
>>
>> Thanks
>
>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e8
>
> Thanks for the bug report! This is offset 232 and that matches
> file->f_mapping as per pahole
> pahole -C file ./vmlinux | grep f_mapping
> struct address_space * f_mapping; /* 232 8 */
>
> I thought that each file really has to have a mapping. But the following
> should heal the issue and add an extra care.
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index f64733c23067..fc9d70a9fbd1 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct
> *vma)
> {
> if (vma_is_anonymous(vma))
> return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma);
> + if (!vma->vm_file || !vma->vm_file->f_mapping)
> + return false;
> if (shmem_mapping(vma->vm_file->f_mapping) && shmem_huge_enabled(vma))
> return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma);
From what I see in code in mm/mmap.c, it seems if vma->vm_file is non-zero
vma->vm_file->f_mapping may be assumed to be non-NULL; see unlink_file_vma()
and __vma_link_file() for two examples, which both use the construct:
file = vma->vm_file;
if (file) {
struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
[ ... ]
[ code that dereferences "mapping" without further checks ]
}
I see nothing wrong with your second check but a few extra instructions
performed, but depending upon how often transparent_hugepage_enabled() is called
there may be at least theoretical performance concerns.
William Kucharski
william.kuchar...@oracle.com
