Hi Mike,

On 01/08/19 at 10:05am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> I'm not thrilled by duplicating this code (yet again).
> I liked the v3 of this patch [1] more, assuming we allow bottom-up mode to
> allocate [0, kernel_start) unconditionally. 
> I'd just replace you first patch in v3 [2] with something like:

In initmem_init(), we will restore the top-down allocation style anyway.
While reserve_crashkernel() is called after initmem_init(), it's not
appropriate to adjust memblock_find_in_range_node(), and we really want
to find region bottom up for crashkernel reservation, no matter where
kernel is loaded, better call __memblock_find_range_bottom_up().

Create a wrapper to do the necessary handling, then call
__memblock_find_range_bottom_up() directly, looks better.

Thanks
Baoquan

> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 7df468c..d1b30b9 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -274,24 +274,14 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock 
> memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t size,
>        * try bottom-up allocation only when bottom-up mode
>        * is set and @end is above the kernel image.
>        */
> -     if (memblock_bottom_up() && end > kernel_end) {
> -             phys_addr_t bottom_up_start;
> -
> -             /* make sure we will allocate above the kernel */
> -             bottom_up_start = max(start, kernel_end);
> -
> +     if (memblock_bottom_up()) {
>               /* ok, try bottom-up allocation first */
> -             ret = __memblock_find_range_bottom_up(bottom_up_start, end,
> +             ret = __memblock_find_range_bottom_up(start, end,
>                                                     size, align, nid, flags);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
>  
>               /*
> -              * we always limit bottom-up allocation above the kernel,
> -              * but top-down allocation doesn't have the limit, so
> -              * retrying top-down allocation may succeed when bottom-up
> -              * allocation failed.
> -              *
>                * bottom-up allocation is expected to be fail very rarely,
>                * so we use WARN_ONCE() here to see the stack trace if
>                * fail happens.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1545966002-3075-3-git-send-email-kernelf...@gmail.com/
> [2] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1545966002-3075-2-git-send-email-kernelf...@gmail.com/
> 
> > +
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * __memblock_find_range_top_down - find free area utility, in top-down
> >   * @start: start of candidate range
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
> 

Reply via email to