On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sorry for delay, vacation,
> 
> On 01/02, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> >
> > zap_pid_ns_processes() can stuck on waiting tasks from the dead list. In
> > this case, we will have one unkillable process with one or more dead
> > children.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > --- a/kernel/exit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> > @@ -664,9 +664,6 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct 
> > *father,
> >  {
> >     struct task_struct *p, *t, *reaper;
> >  
> > -   if (unlikely(!list_empty(&father->ptraced)))
> > -           exit_ptrace(father, dead);
> > -
> >     /* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */
> >     reaper = find_child_reaper(father);
> >     if (list_empty(&father->children))
> > @@ -705,8 +702,18 @@ static void exit_notify(struct task_struct *tsk, int 
> > group_dead)
> >     LIST_HEAD(dead);
> >  
> >     write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > -   forget_original_parent(tsk, &dead);
> > +   if (unlikely(!list_empty(&tsk->ptraced)))
> > +           exit_ptrace(tsk, &dead);
> > +   write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > +
> > +   /* Ptraced tasks have to be released before zap_pid_ns_processes(). */
> > +   list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dead, ptrace_entry) {
> > +           list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
> > +           release_task(p);
> > +   }
> >  
> > +   write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> > +   forget_original_parent(tsk, &dead);
> >     if (group_dead)
> >             kill_orphaned_pgrp(tsk->group_leader, NULL);
> 
> How about a different fix below? It avoids additional 
> write_lock/unlock(tasklist),
> and another list_for_each_entry_safe(dead) loop is called only if it is 
> actually
> needed.
> 
> Or I missed something?

No, you don't. The patch looks really nice. Thanks!

BTW: We probably need to add the "Fixes:" tag, but I am not sure to which
commit, it looks like the issue is here for years.

Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <[email protected]>

> 
> Oleg.
> 
> 
> --- x/kernel/exit.c
> +++ x/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -558,12 +558,14 @@ static struct task_struct *find_alive_th
>       return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
> +static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father,
> +                                             struct list_head *dead)
>       __releases(&tasklist_lock)
>       __acquires(&tasklist_lock)
>  {
>       struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(father);
>       struct task_struct *reaper = pid_ns->child_reaper;
> +     struct task_struct *p, *n;
>  
>       if (likely(reaper != father))
>               return reaper;
> @@ -579,6 +581,11 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_re
>               panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n",
>                       father->signal->group_exit_code ?: father->exit_code);
>       }
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dead, ptrace_entry) {
> +             list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
> +             release_task(p);
> +     }
>       zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
>       write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
>  
> @@ -668,7 +675,7 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
>               exit_ptrace(father, dead);
>  
>       /* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */
> -     reaper = find_child_reaper(father);
> +     reaper = find_child_reaper(father, dead);
>       if (list_empty(&father->children))
>               return;
>  
> 

Reply via email to